EOC 3 Rolling Stone Mag

So I am writing about the article giving the explanation of the article written from the Rolling Stone.  So first off ethically it is doing something wrong, since their image of their particular magazine is glorifying rock stars and other popular entertainers.  Putting out a serious type of article when the public view of the nature of the magazine is entertainment promotion, who’s selling records, who is the popular artist in the industry etc...  They are ethically doing something wrong because more than half of the Americans won’t even read the article because they have made their judgment of the nature of the article, to be glamorizing the villain.  Ethic according to the definition in the text book, is “The study of how people ought to act” http://digitalbookshelf.artinstitutes.edu/books/9781285810416/id/ch2-L1.  They mislead the public by switching up the normal theme Hollywood entertainers, and now getting serious.  The public may not even read the article because their minds have already determined the basis of the article to be glamorizing the terrorist; hence the public controversy over the articles choice in topics and presentation on the cover...  There is also defamation of character going on because the articles actual story is printing facts found by interviewing informants and publicly posting them as fact without a fair trial convicting these findings as actual “facts”.  The text book breaks up defamation into  possibilities and the journalist deformed his character by “Libel, Written defamation. “ http://digitalbookshelf.artinstitutes.edu/books/9781285810416/id/ch5-BX4. But on the flip side for my final statement I will touch apron the fact that  the journalist is protected under her constitutional right that, “The First Amendment guarantees rights of free speech, free press,” http://digitalbookshelf.artinstitutes.edu/books/9781285810416/id/ch5-BX4.

Bibliography

effrey F. Beatty; Susan S. Samuelson. Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law, 4th Edition., 2012. The Art Institutes. Web. 26 July 2013 <http://digitalbookshelf.artinstitutes.edu/books/9781285810416/id/ch2-L1>.